![]() The fact that everyone seems to have a view encourages people to click on the stories about her – the more negative or scurrilous, the better. There is no getting away from the fact that Meghan excites strong opinion from supporters and detractors. As one sign of just how newsworthy he considered Meghan and Harry, his last front page as Sunday editor splashed on the recent royal documentary, The Princes and the Press, while his first in charge of the Daily Mail mentioned it too.įor Meghan herself it was all part of the “deception, intimidation and calculated attacks” by what she called a “daily fail” that “profits from the lies and pain that they create”. Not only did the group pursue its appeal and continue to publish stories about Meghan and Prince Harry in the intervening months but, just a few weeks ago, the Mail on Sunday editor who published the letters, Ted Verity, was elevated to run all print titles. ![]() ![]() They refused to settle and the response to the judgment suggests the appeal could go all the way up to the supreme court. Mail executives argued in court that Meghan was playing her own game with the press, knowing that her letter would be leaked, daring to disintermediate the Mail and other papers by putting statements out on social media. It’s a big win for the Duchess of Sussex, and it raises the question: why on earth did the Mail continue to appeal against the judgment made against it earlier this year?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |